Ways of looking at the world

   The narrator explains human understanding into, "classic" and "romantic". Someone who is classic sees the world in terms of its underpinning structures, and predisposed to logic and the scientific method.They ee the world as underlying form. Romantics sees the world in terms of its surface appearance and are predisposed towards emotions and intuitions, They see the world in terms of immediate appearance.
   I am romantic rather classical because I strongly belive one shouldn't think too much which lead to worrisome. And I don't like that. I'd rather follow my insticnt and take the risk of a the result. I liked to belive dreams do come as long as you work hard for it. I'd rather explore what I want to be in life rather someone tellong and educating me to follow certains paths. One thing I personally think that inoder to bielive something it is not necessary too prove the sicentific method behind it.
  That is, because when I was a year and seven months old I was diagnose with actue leukemia. In my last stage I was fighting for my life. All the scientific method cant't prove why I'm still around,to me. As matter fact, I also tend to believe what I believe. I have trouble agreeing with other people's view. In terms of honesty vs. politeness I'd rather want to see people's real face than the fake one.
   Above all, I disagree with the narrator that “both are valid ways of looking at the world although irreconcilable with each other.” because classic and romantic are both very different personality. One who sees the world emphirically and one is non.