The author, Robert M. Pirsig, discusses two different categories (classic and romantic) to divide philosophy and thinking. Classicists focus on facts, reasons, and laws, and prefer living structured and well thought out lives. They value analysis, education, realism, and “immediate appearance.” On the other hand, romantic minds are more free and spontaneous with their thoughts, emotions, and actions. Romanticists value creativity, feeling and instinct, and spirituality. Romantic thinkers are intuitive and value honesty and have idealistic world views.
i view myself predominantly as a romanticist as I like to follow my gut feelings and see what happens. Being instinctual is important to me as I feel like I am myself even though this can be hard at times. Also, I connect with children and how they follow their heart. Currently, I am working as an intern at Bethesda Elementary and love how they are happy, honest, and not worried about the future. Also, I am honest and direct with my interpersonal relationships and less concerned about what others think.
Not everything about my life fits with the romantic way of thinking. I am a distance runner and my workouts are planned and analyzed to optimize my performance. Also, my daily home routines are structured. I like to eat meals at the same time, complete my homework, and try to keep a regular sleep routine.
I agree with the Robert M. Pirsig that classic and and romantic philosophies are “valid ways of looking at the world ,” but I do not think they are irreconcilable with each other. I believe there are different sides to the human mind and understanding. I think both philosophies can be integrated into all parts of your life. I am a free spirt at heart but live a disciplined lifestyle to achieve certain goals in my life.
No comments:
Post a Comment